Search This Blog

June 24, 2015

How to play a tightening #zinc market

The go-to junior for a tightening zinc market | CEO.CA
Zinc has some of the best fundamentals of any metal out there. Supply is getting tighter and tighter and stockpiles are falling fast. This from ceo.ca

The go-to junior for a tightening zinc market

There has been a solid but quiet performer in the commodities sector recently. Flying largely under most investors' radar is zinc, up 3.9% in 2014. It's often overlooked because as an "industrial" metal it doesn't have the same shine as "precious" metals. According to many analysts, zinc is setting up nicely to continue its upward run in value, and at today's levels offers an interesting option for savvy investors to enjoy potentially substantial returns.
The zinc market demand is currently between 13-14 million tonnes a year, with projected growth of 5% a year. Roughly half of all zinc is used for protecting steel from corrosion (galvanizing). It's an overlooked but important end use: industry experts estimate that if steel was left unprotected it would cost an industrial country's economy at least 4% of GDP each year.
About 17% of zinc demand comes from zinc-based alloys that support the die casting industry. From bathroom fixtures and door and window hardware to office equipment and tools as well as automotive and countless electronic components, zinc castings are everywhere.
Zinc Price
The market is already in a supply-demand deficit and has been for the last couple of years. Stockpiles are rapidly declining. In 2014, zinc output lagged consumption by 296,000 tons, according to the International Lead and Zinc Study Group.
Zinc-price-and-Zinc-LME-levels-CEO.ca3_
Scotiabank commodities analyst Patricia Mohr has a price forecast of $1.60 per pound for zinc in 2016 as the deficit increases. That's 72% higher than today's price of $0.93 cents per pound and could have investors scrambling for zinc names.
Zinc stockpiles have already been cut in half in the last year and currently sit at ~458,000 metric tonnes.
Upcoming zinc mine closures will certainly hasten the decline in stockpiles. Of particular importance will be the closure of MMG's Century Mine in Australia, which is winding down at the end of June. In 2014, Century supplied 465,696 tonnes into a market size of 12 million tonnes (3.8% of world supply).
Later this year, Vedanta Resources' Lisheen mine in Ireland will also close, removing ~150 thousand tonnes from the market.
Don Lindsay, CEO of Teck Resources, one of the world's largest zinc producers, recently stated, "It's starting to look like 2006 all over again." He's referring to a powerful move that took place with the zinc price that year. Stockpiles went from the 600,000-tonne level to below the 100,000 -tonne level briefly before rising again during the financial crisis.  Zinc was up 51.6% in 2005 and 125.7% in 2006. It may be setting up for a similar price move in the near future.
Pipeline
Zinc exploration and development companies must fill the pipeline for future zinc demand. But there are only a handful of quality zinc development projects in the world, which could very easily lead to takeovers in the space at significant premiums – especially for higher-quality names. (Note: most zinc development companies have issues, be they metallurgical, permitting, capex or grade.)
In 2011, with zinc down 25%, Nyrstar Resources saw an opportunity and decided to go shopping. Nyrstar understood that the fundamentals for zinc were setting up favourably so the company purchased two Canadian-listed zinc companies: Breakwater Resources and Farallon Mining. Breakwater was taken over for $663 million in cash (a 44% premium) while Farallon was purchased for $443 million in cash (a 23% premium). Nyrstar may have jumped the gun a little but zinc has had three straight years in the green since the acquisitions.
With the aforementioned two takeovers, Nystar essentially cleaned out the primary zinc producers on the TSX, leaving only Trevali Mining (TV:TSX) as the pure production play.
John MacKenzie, Anglo American's former head of copper, is planning to launch his own public vehicle soon – and is eyeing zinc. He is reviewing takeover targets ahead of a planned $300m to $700m mining float later this year.
"Because zinc has been so unfavoured there's been very limited development, particularly by the majors, so there's relatively little high-quality supply coming online," MacKenzie told Global Mining Observer.
Next down the food chain for investors are the zinc development companies.
Canada Zinc Metals (CZX:TSXV)
Canada Zinc Metals is one investment option for those looking into the zinc space. Here are four reasons why investors might want to consider CZX:
  • Primary commodity (zinc) has strong fundamentals for a price rise.
  • Strong management with a proven track record of success.
  • A high-quality project with expansion potential.
  • A solid balance sheet with no need to raise money anytime soon.
Let's delve a little deeper into these factors:
Supply Crunch
The fundamentals for the zinc price look extremely strong in the next 6-24 months. Large zinc mines are beginning to close down and it's likely we will see the deficit in the zinc market begin to grow. No new large mines are in the pipeline to replace those coming offline.
Zn-mine-production-closure Source: Wood Mackenzie 4Q'13 and MMG Analysis
Demand is expected to remain strong at 5% growth per year for the next couple of years, underpinned by continued growth in the Chinese steel sector and a trend towards value added steels.
Global-Zinc-demand
If these forecasts hold true, the market will need to somehow find the production equivalent to what the Century mine put out last year (465,696 tonnes) just to keep up with demand.
Glencore, a large zinc producer, stated at its recent AGM  "An additional 3-3.5Mt of zinc supply (is) needed over the next 5 years to balance the market."
China, the world's largest zinc producer, is still a wildcard in the zinc market but many analysts do not believe that the Chinese can increase production enough to replace the mines coming offline. China is very secretive when it comes to publicizing production numbers of commodities. What we do know is that China wants to reduce its pollution issues, but to what extent this effort slows down mining is anyone's guess.
Economics 101 holds that when demand exceeds supply the price of whatever is in demand will rise. The zinc market has been in deficit for the last couple of years. Stockpiles have been rapidly declining and are half of what they were last year. Zinc has had a 16% move in the last 3 years but many analysts believe that is just the beginning.
Zinc's last major supply/demand deficit occurred in 2004 with zinc quadrupling in 2 years (going from $0.50 to $2).
(Image source CRU Group)
(Image source CRU Group)

June 21, 2015

What was it like Dad? Tales from the last bust @Mineweb






What was it like Dad?

Mining finance and investment 

The weekend read: Brent Cook provides some perspective on resource markets. 
Brent Cook | 19 June 2015 15:21 
What was it like, Dad?

It was tough kid. We were just coming out of the most perfect spring. The fruit trees were all in blossom, streams filled with fish, deer abounded, and we were all feeling pretty right with the world—we owned it and were the chosen ones.

Then we headed out across the flats, believing the prophets that the next paradise, just over the horizon, was even better. But the horizon never came, the land turned to salt flats and dust; the temperature reached 110°, day after day after day. We burned and suffered. The roving bandits knew we were doomed and had no interest in what little we had left. Each promising oasis was a mirage and one by one we lost our way, numbed and staggering in all directions. We lost nearly everyone on that journey which began so optimistically—and naively.

It was brutal and devastating kid; I hope to never go through that again. But some of us did survive to carry on, and I’m here to tell you about it.

Yeah, right, I’ve heard that, but like, what about the 1997 to 2002 mining bust?

Well, that wasn’t really much different kid. We had come off of a truly remarkable mineral discovery boom from 1992 to 1997. The diamond discoveries in the Northwest Territory were fabulous: Diamet went from $0.21 to $55. Aber Diamonds (now Dominion) had a 40% interest in the Diavik discovery and went from $0.50 to $50. In Labrador, another company looking for diamonds, Diamond Fields, stumbled across a nickel showing (Voisey’s Bay) that was eventually acquired by Inco for $164/per share. It had been a $5 stock.

You see the world had suddenly been opened to modern exploration and all we had to do was Go There: we could do no wrong. Huge area plays developed around these discoveries, and the juniors with land on trend or close by doubled and tripled in a matter of months– regardless of the geology or prospectivity.

Corriente Gold traded up to $18 on a project in Peru that it never had to drill. Arequipa Resources, a copper explorer, put a bunch of holes and a tunnel into the Pierina gold prospect in Peru and went from $0.60 to a buyout price of $30 in nine months. Francisco Gold’s El Sauzal discovery in Mexico took the share price to $40. Queenstake went from $0.07 to $4.50, based on its Kilometer 88 projects in Venezuela.

What, you never heard of these companies? It figures.

I fondly recall my first trip to the Prospectors and Developers (PDAC) conference in March 1997: landing there after a field stint in Brazil (for which I was stiffed) with little more than a windbreaker and a couple of phone numbers. It was an amazing site to behold. Money was flowing everywhere and to everyone—even the strippers were getting rich on insider stock tips. I was literally stunned to see some geologist in khakis working a booth raise $2 million in a matter of minutes, based on a satellite color anomaly somewhere in Mongolia– on a piece of ground I don’t think he even controlled.

It was oysters and champagne at the Canoe Club, lavish parties thrown by all the brokerage firms; even the geologists were invited—engineers, not so much. Greed and speculation were rampant, risk unheard of, and failure? Virtually impossible.

It all seemed so irrational, yet real.

That was the year John Felderhof received the Prospector of the Year award for the 70 million going-to-200 million ounces Bre-X had found in Borneo. Bre-X went from $2.60 to $275 within a three-year period. It was obvious that nearly every one of us was a genius and sitting on millions in profits. We knew it as just going to get better.

Then things began to sour.

Metal prices started to drop; then some guy “falls” out of a helicopter in Indonesia. Bre-X is proven a massive scam and goes to zero. A company that used to be into the garbage container removal business, Cart-away, that had gone from $0.125 to $26 (based on reports of visible nickel and copper in drill core from a property near Voisey’s Bay) went to zero, when assays revealed it was all fool’s gold. Corriente, Francisco, Queenstake, and all the tag-along companies collapsed, folded, or changed their business plans.

I joined Rick Rule at Global Resource Investments just after the Bre-X bust. At that time brokers and clients were thrilled at how much cheaper these highflying stocks had become by mid to late 1997. Companies they had avoided because of the high prices were now affordable, and it was a good time to start picking them up before the boom re-asserted itself. The letter writers were all proclaiming we were getting a second chance—“Don’t waste it”.

We didn’t.

The first stock I bought was Almaden Minerals (AMM) at about $1.25 in late 1997. It had been $3.60 a little over a year earlier. It had great properties, plenty of cash, and was run by a successful and honest geologist, Duane Poliquin. “Better than half off” was the sales pitch.

Well, it went down by more than half again over the following year (1998) and the refrain became “if you liked it at $1.25 you’ve gotta love it at $0.60”. The share price continued to decline into 1999, 2000, and early 2001. At one point you could buy the stock for a little more than cash in the bank: $0.25/share. I picked up a bit more at about $0.50 but couldn’t bear to keep adding to the position, or even look at it in my portfolio. I loathed it.

The Almaden story was mirrored by nearly every junior resource company, or at least those that stayed in business. The only successes during this period were the companies that switched to high tech, the Internet, or biotech. That is where the money went to, and was made, during the 1997 to 2002 resource bust. There was virtually no money coming into the resource sector. Bill Gates could have bought the entire gold industry with half of his Microsoft shares.

Gold had been exposed as a “barbaric relic of the past”—so said all the Wall Street pundits, of little value except for dental fillings and jewelry. Its price fell to $250 an ounce. Copper was at $0.60/lb and uranium $10/lb—all virtually worthless in this new virtual economy.

Value was now perceived as “eyeballs and clicks” on a company’s web site. Profits and profitability became old-fashioned measures of a company’s worth that ignored the limitless future of selling stuff to people all over the world. Junior company promoters, although pretty good at bullshit, could not compete with the New Age Internet Masters at this level. Mining was dead and anyone associated with it abandoned and forgotten on the salt flats.

Our Global brokers would sit for days without a call or sell. Regardless of how good a project was, or how cheap a company had become, there were virtually no buyers. Clients didn’t want to be reminded of their portfolio, let alone add another losing idea to it. Liquidity dried up. Good or bad news were both reasons to sell, and then the news stopped coming at all. Offloading a small $10,000 or even $5,000 position could crush a company’s price. There was no incentive or reason to step into a position that had been declining for years and showed every sign of continuing to do so forever.

The ’97 to ’02 bust dragged on and on and on. It was a lonely desolate space kid.

The first year of the bust was a correction—a buying opportunity. The second we were on bottom. The third, nearing an end: it couldn’t get much worse. By the fourth year I think nearly everyone had resigned him or herself to the fact that gold and metals were indeed going the way of the buggy whip. Gold, copper, uranium, virtually all metals were selling for less than their cost of production. Mining professionals and successful entrepreneurs –the people who knew the industry best–hated it the most. They quit.

I recall a Hard Assets Investment Conference held in some shabby hotel on the outskirts of Miami in 1999. The headline speaker was some nut job newsletter writer who had somehow gotten on NBC, ranting about the end of Western civilization the very microsecond the computer clocks clicked over to January 1, 2000. That, he claimed, was when all the gold and guns stored in your backyard bunkers would become valuable. The conference was absolutely devoid of investors. In desperation, the conference organizers bussed in a load of folks from some nearby old folks homes. They arrived with bags strapped to their walkers and proceeded to steal anything not tied down to a booth. I think that was the low point.

Honestly, it was a depressing period during which a lot of good people abandoned the industry and no new blood entered.

However, in retrospect, it proved to be an exceptional time to buy real companies, assets, and people at a steep discount to their potential or the value represented by those assets.

Almaden Minerals (AMM), which merged with sister company Fairfield, continued its business through the bust, acquiring quality properties that no one cared about, and advancing them to the drill stage. The share price climbed from its low of about $0.25 in 2000 to $3.60 in 2006: a 1,340% gain in six years, if one had bought the low (Fig. 1). As the chart shows, AMM offered a second opportunity for a substantial gain (from the 2008 low) based on the Ixtaca discovery in Mexico. Good people keep coming back.

Figure 1: Almaden Minerals share price

Almaden

Source: Bloomberg (in USD)

Virginia Mines (VIA) was another company I purchased on the way down. A $3.75 stock in 1996 was a “steal” at $1.50 in 1998. Virginia was Andre Gaumond: one of if not the best guys in the business, working in the best province in the world (Quebec), getting money back from the government, and fully funded for years. This was as good as an exploration investment gets.

Yet VIA continued to decline. I reluctantly added a bit later that year at $0.75– I mean the guy had $0.45 a share in cash! At one point in 1999 the stock was selling for $0.35: a 22% discount to cash. The stock languished at under $1.00 until about 2002, eventually hitting $1.50 in late 2003.

Figure 2: Virginia Mines share price

Virginia

Source: Bloomberg (in USD)

After looking at the chart above you are probably expecting, since it’s my tale, that I stayed the trade to the end. I didn’t. Seventy-five cents to $1.50 at that time was a big (and rather rare) win after years of pain. I took the profits and bought you some shoes, kid.

Then in 2004, Andre and his team exposed some gold mineralization in trenches at the Eleónore prospect in Quebec. Over the next two years successive drill campaigns showed Eleónore to be a very large, high-grade gold deposit. Goldcorp acquired the deposit for shares, in a deal that equated to ~$13 per VIA share. Goldcorp proceeded to double after the acquisition. VIA shareholders also received half a share for every VIA share in the Newco, Virginia Gold. Virginia Gold was recently acquired by Osisko Royalties (OR) for ~$14.50.

Bear in mind, all this could be had for a price that valued the original Virginia Mines at less than the cash in its treasury.

Sidenote: (I re-acquired VIA in early 2004 after visiting the trenches at Eleónore when I was contributing to Paul van Eeden’s letter. We held through the ensuing take-outs by Goldcorp and then Osisko: some face saved, and lots of money made.)

Not to belabor a point on this walk down memory lane, but there were other examples of truly stupendous profits that were made on purchases during the ‘97-’02 bust, at a time when having teeth pulled seemed a more enjoyable choice than coughing up the dough for a junior exploration company story.

In late 1997 some young kid named Brian Dalton and his mates who had funded their way through university staking claims and renting trailers during the Voisey’s Bay land rush IPO’d their company at ~$0.25. From there Altius Minerals (ALS) traded as low as $0.18 and slowly climbed to $0.70 over the next four years. ALS was a bet on some frugal Newfies using other people’s money to explore for world-class deposits. The wait was worth it. They attracted Barrick into a search for Carlin gold deposits in Newfoundland, made a uranium discovery in Labrador (Aurora), nearly closed a deal on an oil refinery, and bought a few royalties along the way. The stock got as high as $30 in 2006 and now sits at about $14 (Fig. 3). Buying smart, honest people running companies with a tight share structure in a busted market is usually a good idea—if one has the patience (Fig. 3).

Figure 3: Altius Minerals share price

Altius

Source: Bloomberg (in Canadian Dollar)

First Quantum had built a small copper recovery operation in Zambia near a project I was involved with (ZCCM). Nice little operation, very smart people that we (mostly Rick Rule) financed at ~$0.75 in 1999 in a placement that included a full warrant. The company managed to lever its success into bigger and better African copper projects, hitting $4.50 in 2004 and $27 in 2011 (Fig. 4).

Figure 4: First Quantum share price

First Quantum

Source: Bloomberg (in Canadian Dollar)

I met Ewan Downie, President Wolfden Resources, at the 2002 PDAC. He was an unknown then, with few friends and fewer backers, yet it was clear he had some very good ideas on projects that he had picked up for nothing in the Canadian north. Rick and I financed him at $0.35 and were virtually alone in the deal. He subsequently made the High Lake copper discovery, taking the share price to $8 in 2005. It was eventually sold for $3.60 in 2006 and Premier Gold (PG) was spun out of it.

Nevsun Resources (NSU) was another highflyer from the ‘92 to ’97 boom; it fell from $16 to $0.10 (Fig. 5). Then in January 2003 it discovered the Bisha deposit in Eritrea, which took the share price from about $1 to over $8 (admittedly on some serious broker BS). Nonetheless, the company found a legitimate deposit that is now in production and making good money.

Figure 5: Nevsun Resources share price

Nevsun Resources

Source: Bloomberg (in Canadian Dollars)

On the whole, no. There were certainly some people who understood the cyclical nature of the metals market, and that we couldn’t continue producing copper, gold, etc., at below the cost of production (Ross Beaty, Frank Holmes, and Rick Rule come to mind). But honestly, in 2000 few if any saw the China miracle, emerging markets’ boom, 9/11, Bush, Greenspan, the Iraq debacle, the Taliban, etc., coming. No, the sector was dead and there were few of us left with any optimism or belief.

I don’t see the need to rehash the 2002 to 2010 commodities bull market in any detail—you lived it. Suffice to say the Internet and real estate bubbles burst; gold rose from about $300 to a peak of around $1,900; copper $0.60 to a high of $4.50; uranium ran to ~$130; nickel to ~$23; iron to ~$180: it was all about a billion Chinese buying refrigerators and cars, while the US printed trillions of dollars. Big numbers that attracted big dollars into a sector that had been demolished and was perfectly positioned for a serious melt-up, if there were only a new narrative to bolt onto.

We supplied the ratchet and did it again: nothing could go wrong, and massive quantities of indiscriminate money flowed into mining. The billion in China were soon to be followed by the billions in India and the rest of the developing world. QE and currency debasement was an endless treadmill that guaranteed gold would be the last man standing as fiat currencies imploded around the world.

But then metal prices began to decline, economies slowed, profits disappeared and another crash began again.

What went wrong this time Dad? Is it all over? I mean, like, this time seems really bad.

Disclaimer: Brent Cook owns shares in Lara, B2 Gold, Nevsun, Premier, and Osisko Royalties.

To read more of his weekly newsletters, go to Exploration Insights


What was it like Dad? - Mineweb






June 19, 2015

#Nevsun makes #VMS discovery near #Bisha http://www.mineweb.com/regions/africa/nevsun-makes-vms-discovery-near-bisha/ @Mineweb

Nevsun makes VMS discovery near Bisha - Mineweb
Just yesterday we were talking about Nevsun. There should be plenty more. 

Nevsun makes VMS discovery near Bisha

Exploration

Validating the case for more VMS deposits near Bisha.

Kip Keen | 19 June 2015 11:24

HALIFAX – Nevsun Resources reported a notable volcanogenic massive sulphide discovery Thursday not far from its operating Bisha copper-zinc-gold mine in Eritrea. Calling it Asheli, Nevsun drilled as much as 23 metres @ 2.39% copper and 4.5% zinc, 0.45 g/t gold and 37 g/t silver with a higher grade zone therein. So far Nevsun drilling reveals massive sulphides in a few intercepts over 100 metre strike and 100 metres vertically in a steeply dipping VMS deposit.

How significant the discovery is will remain unclear until Nevsun finishes and reports results from the rest of the dozen-plus drillholes it has drilled over roughly 1 kilometre of strike at the target. The miner – which began mining Bisha in 2011 – has taken a fairly aggressive approach to exploring Asheli. As it notes in a statement Thursday, it made 100-metre step-outs, which should begin to give a rough picture of the immediate size of the Asheli sulphide zone quite quickly.

Even if Asheli proves small, it will nonetheless wet Nevsun's appetite to focus on exploration in the region, 20 kilometres southwest of Bisha. VMS deposits frequently form in clusters and pods. So where there's one, it's usually a good idea to look for others. Indeed, Nevsun has long contended that Bisha and environs, poorly explored, has a good chance of showing more VMS deposits. In that sense, Asheli lends credence to Nevsun's approach and supports the possibility it may find more ore near its operating Bisha mine.

Stefan Ioannou, a Haywood Securities analyst, framed it that way. These are "definitely some very good results…especially given the new discovery's proximity to Bisha," he noted in an email.

The Asheli discovery is also another case of a just-missed deposit by a previous operator on the project. Near surface portions of Asheli had been drilled before Nevsun's tenure, testing for a gold in an oxidized surface anomaly. No deposit was outlined, but that program showed minor chalcopyrite (a copper sulphide) and sphalerite (a zinc sulphide) in stringers. This attracted Nevsun to map the area in greater detail, which showed indications of a VMS deposit. As Nevsun put it in a statement Thursday, "This work defined a 700-metre long zone of highly sericite and chlorite altered felsic volcanic stratigraphy associated with gossan zones enhancing the probability that a VMS deposit was likely to be found in the area".

That led Nevsun to drill a little deeper beneath the near-surface holes, which were duds from the point of view of economic mineralization but not geological information. Just 100 metres below these old holes, Nevsun hit Asheli's massive sulphides.

 



ShareThis

MasterMetals’ Tweets