Canadian commodity hedge fund manager Eric Sprott was shifting his precious metals-focused bets during Q1 as the huge bull run for gold and silver continued.
In recent months, Sprott has been particularly bullish on silver, as the metal went stratospheric before pulling back sharply in commodities trading. In an interview in early April, Sprott predicted silver could go to $100 an ounce and called it "the investment of this decade." In early May, he called the underperformance of silver miners as compared to the metal itself, "shocking."
A look at
Sprott Asset Management's top-15 U.S.-listed equity holdings from the end of Q1 shows that the bullion-backed
Sprott Physical Gold Trust ETV (NYSE:
PHYS -
News), which debuted in early 2010, remained the firm's largest position. Sprott also introduced a similar, silver-backed entity in late 2010, the
Sprott Physical Silver Trust (NYSE:
PSLV -
News). Elsewhere, Sprott was putting capital to work, with a new stake in gold miner
Extorre Gold Mines (AMEX:
XG -
News) and increased stakes in
Yamana Gold (NYSE:
AUY -
News),
Brigus Gold (AMEX:
BRD -
News),
Eldorado Gold (NYSE:
EGO -
News), and
Sprott Resource Lending (AMEX:
SILU -
News), a Sprott-controlled firm that provides funding for commodities companies.
Elsewhere, Sprott was trimming stakes in
Barrick Gold (NYSE:
ABX -
News),
Golden Minerals (AMEX:
AUMN -
News),
Alexco Resource (AMEX:
AXU -
News),
Claude Resources (AMEX:
CGR -
News),
IAMGold (NYSE:
IAG -
News) and
Exeter Resource (AMEX:
XRA -
News). Sprott was reducing its largest silver bets in the three months ended March 31. Sprott slashed its
Silver Wheaton (NYSE:
SLW -
News) and
First Majestic Silver (NYSE:
AG -
News) stakes during the period, but the latter was nonetheless the firm's second-largest equity holding heading into Q2.
Pro portfolio performance is based on institutions' top-15 holdings as disclosed in quarter-end filings with the SEC. Pro performance does not take into account additional holdings beyond the top 15 nor does it include positions that are not required to be disclosed by the SEC. As such, Pro portfolio performance should be considered an approximation and not a precise record of how an institution has performed over time.
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Sprott-Loves-Silver-But-indie-2810516445.html?x=0&.v=1