Search This Blog
September 19, 2023
June 21, 2023
What Really Happened the Night the #Nickel Market Broke
Hundreds of pages of legal filings describe how the LME sleepwalked into a crisis, "that the LME was largely in the dark about Tsingshan's role as the major driver of the price spike until after it had decided to cancel billions of dollars of nickel trades; that the exchange's top decision makers were asleep as the market spiraled out of control; and that Chamberlain made the key decision that the market was disorderly in about 20 minutes after he woke up on March 8 – unaware until much later that the LME's staff had allowed prices to move more rapidly by disabling its own automatic volatility controls."
…
Jane Street alleges the very fact that the LME's key decision makers were asleep was a breach of the exchange's regulatory duties, since it meant that "no-one had been monitoring transactions in order to assess whether there were disorderly trading conditions." The LME disputes that it was in breach.
What oversight there was came from the exchange's trading operations team. They were in charge of operating the LME's price bands, a form of speed bump designed to limit extreme price moves, such as in the case of "fat finger" trades.
But in the early hours of March 8, the operations team received numerous complaints from market participants that the price bands were preventing them from booking trades. At 4:49 a.m., they suspended them altogether.
Dizzying Ascent
It was soon after this that nickel prices started the most dizzying part of their ascent. By the time Chamberlain woke up, at 5:30 a.m., the price was already $60,000 a ton. In the next 38 minutes, it rose another $40,000.
"The abandonment of price bands caused or at least materially contributed to the speed and scale of the increase in prices," Jane Street said in its court filing. "Without price bands in place, the LME could not control price volatility at all."
Chamberlain wasn't aware that his operations team had suspended the price bands, as he made his pivotal decision to suspend the nickel market.
The exchange still didn't have a handle on the scale or the importance of Tsingshan's position — the real reason behind the runaway rally.
…
Brokers on the LME would normally need to pay their first margin call of the day by 9 a.m., based on prices prevailing at around 7 a.m. If that had happened on March 8, the LME would have needed to request $19.75 billion from 28 banks and brokers – an unprecedented sum that was more than 10 times the previous daily record before March 2022.
See the whole article on Bloomberg here:
March 15, 2022
#Nickel Market #Telenovela
Here is a recap of the week's events:
February 24, 2021
“I used to go with 500,000 pounds to London…” #Commodities Traders’ Long History of “Commissions” to Seal Deals
"In those days paying so-called "commissions" was both legal and even tax-deductible for a Swiss company…"
April 17, 2020
Dislocation of #Gold Markets Continues
March 6, 2020
There Are 316 Men Leading #Commodities Houses and Only 14 Women - Bloomberg
See the whole report here : https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-03-19/there-are-316-men-leading-top-commodity-houses-and-only-14-women
January 1, 2020
April 1, 2019
#Gold worth $37BN traded in London each day, new data shows
Gold worth $37 billion traded in London each day, new data shows
(Reuters) - Members of the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA) traded at least 30.2 million ounces of gold worth $36.9 billion each day last week, the LBMA said on Tuesday, presenting new data that gives the most accurate picture yet of the London market.
PHOTO: Gold bullion is displayed at Hatton Garden Metals precious metal dealers in London, Britain July 21, 2015. REUTERS/Neil Hall
With regulators pushing for greater transparency, LBMA members have begun reporting trades that
settle in London and Zurich, another trading center closely connected to London.
“For the first time in the long history of the London gold market its size is not guesswork but a reliable measurement,” Macquarie analyst Matthew Turner said in a note accompanying the LBMA
figures.
According to the LBMA, its members last week traded 95 million ounces of gold in spot contracts, 46.5 million ounces in swaps and forward contracts, 4.1 million ounces in options and 5.4 million
ounces in leases, loans and deposits.
That gives a daily average total of 30.2 million ounces - or 939 tonnes, the equivalent of 74 London double-decker busses.
January 7, 2019
MainStreet is Super Bullish On #Gold. What Happened Last Time they were this Bullish?
Sentiment among traders has turned openly bullish on gold, Anna Golubova writes.
Kitco’s latest Wall Street versus Main Street gold survey revealed that Main Street might be overly bullish on gold prices this week, with nearly 80% of individuals polled saying they expect gold prices to rise after briefly hitting the $1,300 mark last week.
Last time Main Street was this bullish was April 12, when 84% of individuals polled called for higher prices. That was one day after gold prices had peaked on April 11 at $1,385.40, with futures beginning their prolonged decline that lasted roughly until mid-October. February Comex gold futures were last trading at $1289.60, up 0.30% on the day.
“Most veteran market watchers know the old saying that most of the general investing public is wrong on their notions of markets’ price direction most of the time. The fact that ‘Main Street’ is so bullish on gold prices at present does suggest the gold market has the potential a significant downside correction soon,” Kitco’s senior technical analyst Jim Wyckoff said.
Other analysts pointed out that such bullish sentiment coming from Main Street is a sign that gold is finally looking ready to break through its psychological resistance of $1,300 an ounce.
Are we in store for another decline in gold just around the corner?
See the article on Kitco: Is Main Street Overly Bullish On Gold? And What Does That Mean For Prices? | Kitco News
MasterMetals
@MasterMetals
December 11, 2018
Impending retirement of #Glencore’s #copper chief Mistakidis marks start of generational shift at the world’s most powerful commodity trader
May 1, 2015
#Gold Manipulators Busted After @ZeroHedge Report On Flagrant Gold #Spoofing
Gold Manipulators Busted After Zero Hedge Report On Flagrant Gold Spoofing
place in every asset class, but mostly in the E-mini futures ("Dear CFTC: This Is The Market Manipulating "Spoofing" Taking Place In The E-Mini Just Today [7]").
Virtually every day since then we presented the "regulators" at the commodity trading commission a clear example of stock market manipulation, with the exception of Tuesday, when with the exclusive help of Nanex [8], we showed a clear case of gold spoofing.
This is what we said on April 28 [9]:
Here (courtesy of Nanex [8]) are
several examples in the June 2015 Comex Gold Futures this morning. All
times are Eastern Daylight. In each of these cases, no trades (or a
tiny few) executed against the large "spoof" order. You can see how
prices were influenced by the sudden appearance (and disappearance) of
these large, outsized orders.
1. June 2015 Comex Gold
Note how large buy and sell orders push prices up and down. [10]
[10]
2. Another set of instances appear about 50 minutes after the first set (shown in chart 1).
[11]
3. Another set of spoofing instances appear about an hour after the second set (shown in chart 2).
[12]
You're welcome CFTC — it's the least we can do.
Best wishes,
Zero Hedge
Reminder: We won't stop this until you are forced to address theMuch to our dismay, overnight we learned that while the CFTC
glaring hypocrisy and utter incompetence of everyone involved in the
regulation of market microstructure.
continues to be very, very confused and challenged by all those lobby
payments by the world's "liquidity providing" HFTs and ignores all documented
evidence of manipulation, the Chicago Mercantile Exchange - owner of
the futures exchange wheer the bulk of modern manipulation takes place -
did read this evidence of manipulation, and decided to immediately take action, suspending two traders for placing the manipulative "spoofing and layering" trades profiled here three days ago
which were virtually identical to the ones that got Navinder Singh
Sarao into headlines around the world last week. Except, of course, the
asset class manipulated was gold. And, perhaps what's far worse, the
manipulation sent the price of gold briefly higher.
The names of the perpetrators: perhaps not surprisingly, Heet Khara
and Nasim Salim. Extend to Navinder Sarao and a pattern emerges...
This is the full CME release [13]:
We expect the CFTC and the DOJ to unleash the wrath of god now thatNOTICE OF SUMMARY ACCESS DENIAL ACTION: COMEX 15-0103-SA-1
NON-MEMBER:
NASIM SALIM
CME RULE: 413. SUMMARY ACCESS DENIAL ACTIONS (in part)
A. The Chief Regulatory Officer or his delegate, upon a good faith
determination that there are substantial reasons to believe that such
immediate action is necessary to protect the best interests of the
Exchange, may order that: 1) any party be denied access to any or all
CME Group markets; 2) any party be denied access to the Globex platform;
3) any party be denied access to any other electronic trading or
clearing platform owned or controlled by CME Group; or (4) any Member be
immediately removed from any trading floor owned or controlled by CME
Group.
FINDINGS
On April 30, 2015, CME Group’s Market Regulation Department (“Market
Regulation Department”), through its Chief Regulatory Officer, summarily
denied Nasim Salim (“Salim”) direct and indirect access to all CME
Group markets, the CME Globex electronic trading platform, any other
electronic trading or clearing platform owned or controlled by CME
Group, and all trading floors owned or controlled by CME Group. The
summary access denial prohibits trading, placing orders, and controlling
or directing the trading for any person or entity in any CME Group
exchange product. The summary access denial further prohibits the
affiliation or business dealing with any member or member firm of CME,
CBOT, NYMEX, or COMEX.
CME Group’s Chief Regulatory Officer’s summary access denial of Salim
was based upon the findings of an investigation conducted by the Market
Regulation Department, which revealed that on multiple trade
dates during the time period of March 1, 2015 through April 28, 2015,
Salim engaged in a pattern of activity in which he repeatedly entered
orders or layered multiple orders for Gold and Silver futures contracts
without the intent to trade. Specifically, Salim entered these
orders or layered multiple orders to encourage market participants to
trade opposite his smaller orders resting on the opposite side of the
book. After receiving a fill on his smaller orders, Salim would
then cancel the resting order or layered multiple orders that he had
entered on the opposite side of the order book.
Salim introduced Heet Khara (“Khara”), who is also the subject of a
summary access denial action, to his first FCM and Salim had an account
at the second FCM at which Khara traded in a disruptive manner. Further,
it appears that on multiple occasions Salim and Khara coordinated
efforts to engage in disruptive activity. In
an example from April 28, 2015, Salim entered small-lot orders on one
side of the market in Gold futures, after which Khara entered large
orders on the opposite side. When Salim’s small orders were filled,
Khara canceled the large orders. Salim has not responded to
correspondence from the Exchange.
The foregoing conduct, as well as Salim’s failure to cooperate with
the Exchange, present a good faith determination that there are substantial
reasons to believe that such immediate action is necessary to protect
the best interests of the Exchanges and the marketplace.
ACCESS DENIAL:
Pursuant to Rule 413, this access denial will remain in effect for 60
days, commencing on the effective date below and continuing through and
including June 29, 2015, unless the Chief Regulatory Officer or his
delegate provides written notice that this access denial will be
extended for an additional period of time.
the CME showed them how gold manipulation works, something they figured
out by looking a this article [9].
And while we are delighted that yet one more alleged case of gold
manipulation is now confirmed, we are curious if the CME, CFTC and DOJ
will also prosecute instances of gold manipulation when the ultimate
outcome is the price of gold going lower instead of higher, such as the
one documented in "Vicious Gold Slamdown Breaks Gold Market For 20 Seconds [14]", "Stop Logic" Gold Slam Was So Furious It Shut Down CME Trading Again [15]" and on countless other occasions most of which have been duly documented on this website.
Finally, we wonder: will the CME, CFTC, DOJ, and FBI pursue as
promptly all those instances of constant S&P 500 manipulation and
spoofing we profiled over the past week in particular [16],
and over the past 6 years in general? Or was this merely another
"Sarao" case when several (non-Caucasian) traders are scapegoated by the
regulators, with the naive expectation that investors will suddenly
assume the market - in this case that of gold - is no longer rigged?
[1] http://www.zerohedge.com/users/tyler-durden
[2] http://www.zerohedge.com/taxonomy_vtn/term/11403
[3] http://www.zerohedge.com/taxonomy_vtn/term/158
[4] http://www.zerohedge.com/taxonomy_vtn/term/10120
[5] http://www.zerohedge.com/taxonomy_vtn/term/8562
[6] http://www.zerohedge.com/taxonomy_vtn/term/10107
[7] http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-04-22/dear-cftc-market-manipulating-spoofing-taking-place-e-mini-just-today
[8] http://www.nanex.net/aqck2/4700.html
[9] http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-04-28/dear-cftc-here-todays-illegal-spoofing-gold-futures
[10] http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user92183/imageroot/2015/04/NanexGold1.jpg
[11] http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user92183/imageroot/2015/04/NanexGold2.jpg
[12] http://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user92183/imageroot/2015/04/Nanex3.jpg
[13] http://www.cmegroup.com/tools-information/lookups/advisories/disciplinary/COMEX-15-0103-NASIM-SALIM.html#pageNumber=1
[14] http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-09-12/vicious-gold-slamdown-breaks-gold-market-20-seconds
[15] http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-10-11/stop-logic-gold-slam-was-so-furious-it-shut-down-cme-trading-again
[16] http://lmgtfy.com/?q=zerohedge+dear+cftc
Gold Manipulators Busted After Zero Hedge Report On Flagrant Gold Spoofing | Zero Hedge
March 31, 2014
The changing world of energy trading #MasterEnergy @PlattsOil
Banks involved in energy have pulled back from the sector while merchant
traders known largely for their secrecy are strengthening their
position
The changing world of energy commodity trading
The Barrel Blog
By Jeff Ryser | March 28, 2014 11:48 AM Comments (2)world of energy commodity trading has gone through a rather extensive
reshuffling over the past few months. The key thing to note is that
banks involved in energy have pulled back from the sector while merchant
traders known largely for their secrecy are strengthening their
position.
The most notable deal came last week when Swiss-based merchant firm Mercuria agreed to buy the entire physical commodity trading business of JPMorgan Chase
for $3.5 billion. Mercuria, which is headquartered in Geneva and is
predominantly a crude and refined products trading shop, has a team of
approximately 1,200 people working in some 37 offices around the globe
and has annual “turnover,” or essentially gross annual revenues of
around $100 billion.
JPMorgan, whose overall size is an
astounding $2.4 trillion in terms of the value of all its assets, had
valued the oil trading portion of the business it sold to Mercuria at
$1.7 billion. It valued its US and European natural gas trading business
at approximately $800 million, its metals business at $500 million and
its electricity and coal trading businesses at approximately $300
million, prior to the sale.
Mercuria therefore agreed to pay $200
million or so above book and will add JPMorgan physical assets, trading
books and contract to its already extensive trading portfolio.
Included
in the deal, apparently, is a trading team in London, New York, Houston
and Singapore that numbers more than 400 people. When JPMorgan bought
the trading operations of RBS Sempra in 2010 for $1.9 billion, it saw
its trading staff balloon to almost 700 people. It spent several years
bringing that staffing level down to a more manageable level.
Now,
Mercuria, founded by Swiss nationals Marco Dunand and Daniel Jaggi in
2004, will begin the task of integrating the various JPMorgan trading
teams with its own teams. Also now under discussion, according to
JPMorgan, is the future role at Mercuria, if any, of Blythe Masters, the
45 year-old British-born global head of JPMorgan’s commodities unit.
Dunand
and Jaggi have both spoken recently, and publicly (at places like
Davos), acknowledging the fact that the merchants’ penchant for secrecy
runs counter to the push by governments to instill far greater trading
transparency. With its deal to buy JPMorgan, Mercuria, for example, will
have to report physical US natural gas sales to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission. Its US affiliate already reports its quarterly US
wholesale power sales to FERC.
Mercuria’s vision of its business model is fairly clear. In a recent interview with the newspaper Neue Zurcher Zeitung,
Dunand offered that there are “two schools” for commodity trading. He
said, “One is the Marc Rich school, with Glencore and Trafigura, which
is obviously successful. And then there is the investment bank school,
which has more of a risk approach.”
Marc Rich, of course, is the
legendary commodities trader who, while working for Philipp Brothers in
the late 1960’s and early 1970’s essentially created the spot market for
crude, thereby breaking the hold over the market that big oil companies
had using long-term supply contracts with supplier countries.
The
key idea behind March Rich-style trading is to have access to your own
logistics, such as shipping and storage, and to strike deals with big
bulk buyers. The merchants are also not subject to Dodd-Frank trading
restrictions, as are the banks.
On the other hand, the investment
bank school of trading implies a far greater dependence on the
financial markets to not only hedge positions but also to hedge
positions for fee-paying clients. When trading for their own book–which
banks will be prohibited from doing when the so-called Volcker rule is
implemented in mid-2015–the investment banks rely heavily upon churn, or
buying and selling and re-buying and re-selling, to generate revenue
from large volumes of trading. This activity also provides markets with
liquidity.
Joining Glencore, Trafigura, and Mercuria as exemplars of the Rich school of commodity trading are Gunvor and Vitol.
On
Monday, the head of Vitol, Ian Taylor, made a comment on the impact of
the banks leaving the energy commodities trading business. He said, “The
withdrawal of some investment banks from commodity related activities
has reduced liquidity in markets such as power.” This is no doubt true,
since the pull-back by the banks has been most pronounced in the
wholesale power trading business due in no small part to tightened
regulations and lower prices and thus dampened price volatility.
It
was Taylor’s next comment, though, that also caught some people’s
attention. He said that the reduced liquidity “created longer-term
opportunities and our footprint in both the US and Europe is growing.”
Taylor
conceded that 2013 was “a very challenging year for many in the
physical energy distribution business.”” He said that “markets remained
extremely competitive with new entrants increasing margin pressure on
certain regional activity.” “While these market conditions aren’t
expected to change overnight, changing supply and demand balances are
generating some new opportunities,” Taylor said.
Meanwhile,
Barclays PLC and Deutsche Bank are understood to be selling their power
trading books, as the big UK and German banks announced they are exiting
the business.
While Citibank has been trying to strengthen its
trading in Europe and the US, Bank of America Merrill Lynch, strong in
the US, has shutdown European natural gas and power trading.
Morgan
Stanley, of course, is in the process of selling its Global Oil
Merchant unit to the Russian oil company Rosneft, for an undisclosed sum
that is nonetheless estimated to be in the range of $400 million.
Roughly 100 Morgan trading executives are expected to go to work for
Rosneft in London and New York, or about a third of Morgan’s entire
global commodity trading team. Rosneft earlier established a trading
unit in Geneva that is headed up by a former Shell trader.
One
question that has popped up is whether there are any future US or
European sanctions in the offing against Rosneft chief Igor Sechin, and
whether such sanctions could hurt the deal with Morgan Stanley. The US
and the EU have already leveled sanctions against individuals in
retaliation for Russian President Vladimir Putin’s move into Crimea.
Sechin is a former chief of staff to Putin and was appointed head of
Rosneft by Putin in 2004.
On March 20 the US sanctioned the
Russian Gennady Timchenko, who was co-founder of Gunvor. The
Geneva-based firm said that the day before the sanctions were announced,
Timchenko sold his shares in the firm to Swedish co-founder Torborn
Tornqvist, who now owns 87% of the 14 year-old company. Gunvor, mainly
an oil and products trader, employs approximately 500 front and back
office trading professionals and 1,100 people at logistical facilities,
has said that revenue in 2012 was roughly $93 billion.
The US
Treasury Department said it imposed the sanctions against Timchenko out
of the belief that Russian president Vladimir Putin had earlier
invested in Gunvor and “may have access to Gunvor funds,” an assertion
that Gunvor denied.
The changing world of energy commodity trading « The Barrel Blog
The MasterMetals Blog
December 3, 2012
#MuddyWaters weighs on #commodities traders
Financial Times, 8:22am Monday December 3rd, 2012--
By Javier Blas, Commodities Editor
--
Industry executives worry that the US short seller's allegations surrounding Olam are hitting investor appetite for the sector as a whole
Read the full article at: http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/ee2cf2e8-3d10-11e2-9e13-00144feabdc0.html
May 8, 2012
May 16, 2011
Citigroup recommends reducing resources exposure in order to cut risk
MarketWatch
By Sarah Turner
SYDNEY (MarketWatch) -- Citigroup Australian equity strategists said Tuesday that they recommend investors reduce exposure to the resource sector in order to cut risk. They cut miners to a small overweight in their portfolio and moved to underweight in energy stocks. At the same time, they lifted their positioning in defensive sectors of the market, by raising healthcare firms to index level and upping weightings in banks and other industrials. 'While resources have underperformed by about 5% recently, this only reverses gains a month earlier, and the sector could fall further,' they said.
Citigroup recommends reducing resources exposure - MarketWatch
Sprott Loves Silver, But Slashes Many Mining Stakes
May 13, 2011
'Widowmaker' Oil Trade Lives Up to Its Name - CNBC
Widowmaker' Oil Trade Lives Up to Its Name
May 4, 2011
Glencore lists fraud, criminal case among IPO risks - Yahoo! Finance
Glencore lists fraud, criminal case among IPO risks
By Clara Ferreira-Marques and Quentin Webb
LONDON (Reuters) - Commodity trader Glencore, set to list this month in one of London's largest-ever offerings, has detailed its involvement in a Belgian criminal probe as it outlines risks to investors, including fraud and corruption.
Glencore said in a prospectus on Wednesday, ahead of its planned $11 billion listing, that its subsidiary Glencore Grain Rotterdam, a former employee and a current employee had been charged in a criminal case in Belgium.
Glencore said the criminal investigation was probing a public official, the European Commission's Directorate General for Agriculture and others for "violation of professional secrecy, corruption of an international civil servant and criminal conspiracy."
Glencore's unit and its current and former employees have been charged with having committed corruption in exchange for information on European export subsidies, it added.
The case was initiated in 2003, with co-operation from Dutch and French police, and covers facts dating from 1999 to 2003.
Commission agriculture spokesman Roger Waite confirmed that the EU executive expected a trial into alleged corruption by former agriculture department official Karel Brus.
Brus, a Dutch national, is accused of having passed confidential information relating to EU export subsidy application decisions to a French farming lobbyist between 1999 and 2003.
"As far as the Commission is concerned, we cannot comment further on an ongoing investigation," Waite said.
Glencore declined to comment on the case beyond details included in the prospectus. It says it is not involved in legal proceedings which could have a material impact on its profits.
Belgium's federal prosecutor confirmed on Wednesday that there is a criminal case against Glencore but declined to comment further. The case will be heard in Brussels on May 12.
The Commission, the European Union's executive arm, has become a civil party to the case, Glencore said.
FRAUD RISK
Glencore also listed in its prospectus over 30 other risks to the broader company, its marketing and trading operations.
The formerly publicity-averse trader and miner operates around the world and says its willingness to move into riskier countries in Eastern Europe, Central Africa and South America before rivals gives it a "first-mover advantage."
Companies typically outline a vast number of risks to future performance in the run-up to a listing, in order to satisfy requirements to provide a full picture for future investors.
Glencore, however, detailed more than many, with risks including declines in demand for commodities, geopolitical risk and the risk it may not be able to retain key employees.
It also raised the risk of fraud and corruption, "both internally and externally."
"Glencore's marketing operations are large in scale, which may make fraudulent or accidental transactions difficult to detect. In addition, some of Glencore's industrial activities are located in countries where corruption is generally understood to exist," the company said.
Glencore said it has internal controls, external due diligence and compliance policies.