Search This Blog

July 31, 2013

#Uralkali Breaks #Potash Accord to Grab Market Share $POT $MOS $URKA $ICL $AGU

The gloves are off in the battle for market share in the Potash market.

Uralkali Breaks Potash Accord to Grab Market Share - Bloomberg

OAO Uralkali (URKA), the world’s largest potash producer, upended the $20 billion-a-year commodity market by abandoning limits on output that underpinned prices while halting cooperation with Belarus that controlled supplies from the former Soviet Union.
The announcement of the decision yesterday sent shares of potash miners plunging as much as 27 percent from Israel to Germany to Canada and the U.S. as investors speculated a flood of supplies will lead to lower prices for the soil nutrient that strengthens plant roots. Uralkali, part-owned by billionaire Suleiman Kerimov, said it exited its marketing venture with Belarus after its neighbor undermined sales accords.
“Uralkali’s announcement completely turns the global potash market upside down,” Elena Sakhnova, a VTB Capital analyst in Moscow, said by phone. “If previously global potash producers were acting like an oligopoly, working with the rule that benefited higher potash prices over shipped volumes, now the market will be fully competitive.”
Uralkali’s venture with Belarus, and a group comprising Potash Corp. (POT) of Saskatchewan Inc., Mosaic Co. and Agrium Inc. (AGU) played off each other, moderating output and exports along with demand to prevent price swings.
Uralkali shares fell 19 percent to 151.92 rubles in Moscow yesterday, the biggest drop since November 2008. Trading was suspended for a half hour after shares crossed the 20 percent threshold.

Trading ‘Deadlock’

K+S AG (SDF) shares plummeted 24 percent in Frankfurt, the most in 14 years, and Israel Chemicals Ltd. (ICL) fell 18 percent in Tel Aviv. Potash Corp. and Mosaic both dropped 17 percent in New York and Agrium declined 5.4 percent.
Uralkali plans to switch exports to its own unit, Uralkali Trading, from Belarusian Potash Co., a joint venture with Belaruskali set up in 2005 to bolster their market position. Cooperation reached “a deadlock” after Belarus’s government canceled BPC’s exclusive right to export the nation’s potash and Belaruskali exported the fertilizer ingredient on its own, the Berezniki, Russia-based producer said in a statement.
Filipp Gritskov, a BPC spokesman, declined to comment, as did Olga Dolgaya, a spokeswoman for the government of Belarus.
“The potash price may fall below $300 a ton after the change in our trading policy,” Uralkali Chief Executive Officer Vladislav Baumgertner said. That’s at least 25 percent below the current contract price for China and the lowest since January 2010. The price will remain higher than $200 a metric ton, the production cost level for some international producers, he said.

Price Decline

Potash in Vancouver, an export port for the commodity, fetched $410 a ton as of July 29, according to weekly price data from Green Markets. The price has dropped 19 percent in the past 12 months. It reached $840 in 2009 before plunging to $325 the following year as farmers postponed purchases.
Uralkali, which has the lowest production costs among international peers, will run at full capacity next year, Baumgertner told reporters by phone. Output will rise to 13 million tons in 2014 from 10.5 million tons this year, he said. Uralkali’s production cost is $62 a ton, compared with more than $100 a ton for North American producers and almost $240 in Europe, according to a company presentation in July.
Other global producers will be hurt more than Uralkali, which will be cushioned by increasing sales volumes, Sakhnova said. It’s the only potash producer that can ship potash by rail directly to China, the largest consumer of the soil nutrient, and it may hinder Belarus’s reach into the market, she said.

China Supplies

Rail deliveries to China will reach as much as 2.5 million tons of potash annually, Baumgertner said. Uralkali forecasts stable revenue on increased sales volumes and will keep its dividend policy unchanged, he said.
Uralkali will extend its first-half supply contract with China through December, meaning it will ship as much as 500,000 tons more potash to the Asian market by the end of the year, Baumgertner said. The price may be cut from the current $400 per ton, he said.
China’s current spot price of $350 a ton may “to some extent” be considered a target this year, he said.
Uralkali hadn’t planned to renew the China contract this year, hoping to sign a new agreement in October or November at a price no lower than the current level, according to a statement from Baumgertner on May 29. At the time, it also cut railway shipments by about two-thirds to get a higher price.

Billionaire Sales

Uralkali said July 22 it bought back about $1.3 billion as part of a $1.6 billion repurchase program. Goldman Sachs Group Inc. cut Uralkali to hold July 24, a day before VTB Capital reduced its rating on the stock to sell.
Anticipating the shift in trading policy will create volatility in the share prices of all global potash producers, including itself, Uralkali said it has frozen the buyback program and won’t make a tender offer for its stock by the end of the year, according to Baumgertner. Last month, Baumgertner said that the board in November may consider more stock purchases so that major shareholders could participate.
Billionaire Alexander Nesis sold off his 5.1 percent stake in Uralkali, the company said July 26, two weeks after the company completed buying out shareholder Zelimkhan Mutsoev for $1.3 billion.
Uralkali also decided against proceeding with its Polovodovskoye greenfield development because of the potential changes in the potash market, Baumgertner said.
“No longer does Uralkali plan to follow a price before volume strategy,” analysts at Liberum Capital Ltd., led by Sophie Jourdier, said yesterday in a note. “We expect global potash prices to fall.”
To contact the reporter on this story: Yuliya Fedorinova in Moscow at yfedorinova@bloomberg.net
To contact the editor responsible for this story: John Viljoen at jviljoen@bloomberg.net


Uralkali Breaks Potash Accord to Grab Market Share - Bloomberg

The MasterMetals Blog

July 30, 2013

How many barrels of #oil are produced and consumed a day?

#MasterEnergy #Oil facts and questions:

How many barrels of oil are produced and consumed a day?
As of 2011, approximately 89 million barrels of oil and liquid fuels were consumed per day worldwide. That works out to nearly 32 billion barrels a year.

How many gallons of oil are there in a barrel?
42 US gallons (35 imperial gallons), or 159 litres.

Where is the bulk of oil demand growth going to come from?
In the next five years, almost half of global oil demand growth will come from China, and this trend is set to continue to 2035, as oil demand from the transportation sector is growing strongly in countries such as China and India. In contrast, oil demand among OECD countries is expected to decline over the next two decades, driven mostly by government policies on fuel efficiency and the fact that rates of vehicle ownership are already high.

See more Oil facts and questions here: IEA - Oil

Better managing #gold's stock performance | Deloitte Canada

over the past 10 years [there has been] a three- and sometimes four-fold spike in invested capital requirements per ounce produced.
working capital requirements have gone up due to increased post-production inventories because rising prices have made it more economical to process lower grades. 
Some gold companies have experienced total cash cost increases between 100% and 325%



Better managing gold's stock performance
Create value with comprehensive economic analysis

By Sunil Kansal

Investors typically expect the stock price of gold mining companies to be strongly correlated with the price of gold. But, since 1996, gold has increased by more than 400% in price while the performance of individual gold stocks has shown a wide range in trends and sensitivities.

There’s at least one response that gold companies can take to better manage stock performance: comprehensive economic measurement, otherwise known as economic margin¹ analysis. In our experience, implementing this kind of framework — which incorporates consideration of cash flow, investment and cost of capital — can help companies quantify the key drivers of long-term stock performance and, accordingly, support executive decision-making.

Many buy-side analysts are already doing it anyway and better value is created in the process. The explanation usually lies in the framework that allows for the measurement of net impact from all factors under the company’s control to lead to quantitative models. Those models in turn enable quantitative decision-making based on the intrinsic calculation of stock prices. Put another way, executives can use the framework to effectively predict the effect of various capital investments on the stock price.

At the end of the day, successful companies measure results, make decisions and set strategy with the goal of creating value.

A company’s performance measures must serve as a proxy for its market value creation. Economic margin is simply a more complete performance measure to guide performance and motivate employees.

What affects the price of gold
It’s no mystery that the price of gold is affected by myriad technical and fundamental factors, including the following:
Supply and demand;
Emergence of financial instruments;
Economic and company events;
Gold reserves and resources;
Costs of operations and capital.

Of course, everyone is affected by the commodity price; it’s the mixed performance of various stocks that exposes the company to specific factors playing a bigger role in the commodity-stock delinking phenomenon.

Gold consumption and supply
Between 1996 and 2011, annual gold consumption increased at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 2.96% versus 2.37% for supply. That demand was driven primarily by investments in bars, coins and exchange-traded funds (ETFs), the latter of which in particular have enabled easy trading removed from the insecurity of physical gold. Supply during that timeframe, on the other hand, was constrained by decreasing average sizes and deteriorating quality of new deposits as well as increasing operational cost pressures.

Meanwhile, various macroeconomic events of the sort that directly influence gold investors’ behaviour (such as the recent global economic downturn) continue to have a strong impact on the spot gold price and contribute to both price volatility and deviations from long-term supply and demand fundamentals.

A three-fold spike in capital requirements
On the stock performance side, increased gold prices have resulted in higher revenues. On the other hand, declining grade quality has led to fewer ounces of gold being extracted from each ton of ore, resulting in lower average margin potential per ton due to higher cost of production per ounce. The challenges in finding high-quality resources, meanwhile, along with corresponding increases in the cost of exploration and development, have resulted over the past 10 years in a three- and sometimes four-fold spike in invested capital requirements per ounce produced.

Depreciable assets per ounce have also increased over the last 10 years at a similar scale on rising discovery, acquisition, construction and equipment costs. And working capital requirements have gone up due to increased post-production inventories because rising prices have nevertheless made it more economical to process lower grades.

It gets better – by which, I mean worse
Since 2000, operating cash flows of mining companies have been impacted by rising material and consumable costs. Some gold companies have experienced total cash cost increases between 100% and 325%. Those increases have in turn reduced the impact of enhanced revenues from the rising price of gold on operating margins to the tune of 34%-87% compared to the 400% commodity price increase.

Added to all of that, evidence also suggests that cost of capital has decreased by an average of 1% in absolute terms, leading to significant improvement in the valuation of gold stocks.
"Economic Margin Framework" is a trademark of The Applied Finance Group (AFG) and is used here with permission.

Read Sunil's feature article in the Spring 2013 edition of Canadian Mining Magazine.


Sunil Kansal is a senior manager in Deloitte’s Consulting practice. He specializes in mining.

Read the article on the Deloitte Canada site: Better managing gold's stock performance | Deloitte Canada


The MasterMetals Blog

ShareThis

MasterMetals’ Tweets